|
Living fossil is the nickname given to organisms whose
traces appear in the fossil layers from early geological periods,
of which living specimens are still found today. These living things
exhibit no differences from their counterparts from millions of
years ago, and represent living examples of those long-dead fossil
forms.
Without doubt, the most important of these is the forementioned Cœlacanth.
For many years, evolutionists portrayed it as the most significant
supposed intermediate form, on which they wasted a great deal of
speculation until the first surprise appeared in 1938.
The Cœlacanth: An Example of a False Intermediate Form
The evolutionist paleontologist J. L. B. Smith and
the living Cœlacanth found in the Comoro Islands. This first
specimen showed that the Cœlacanth was a fully-fledged
fish, not an intermediate form as claimed by evolutionists.
Another 200 specimens discovered since have confirmed this
significant fact.
A 410-million-year-old
Cœlacanth
fossil. |
Off the coast of southern Africa,
in the winter of 1938, a fishing boat called The Nerine dragged
from the Indian Ocean near the Chalumna River a fish thought
to be extinct for 70 million years. The fish was a cœlacanth,
an animal that thrived concurrently with dinosaurs...18
These words, by the evolutionist Keith S. Thompson,
chairman of the Oxford University Academy of Natural Sciences,
are a clear expression of how quickly an evolutionary myth faded into
nothing. The catching of a live specimen of Cœlacanth did
away with one of the greatest fake foundations of the theory of
evolution.
The Cœlacanth,
which according to the fossil record, dates back some 410 million
years to the Devonian period, was regarded by evolutionists as
a powerful intermediate form between fish and reptile. It had
been mysteriously erased from the fossil record 70 million years
ago, during the Cretaceous
period, and was believed to have become extinct at that time.19 Based
on these fossils, evolutionist biologists suggested that this creature
had a non-functioning, "primitive" as evolutionists
put it, lung. Speculation regarding the Cœlacanth became
so widespread that the fish was cited in many scientific publications
as the most significant evidence for evolution. Paintings and drawings
of it leaving the water for the land quickly began appearing in
books and magazines. Of course, all these assumptions, images and
claims, were based on the idea that the creature was extinct.
The truth was very different, however. Since
1938, more than 200 present-day Cœlacanths have
been caught, after that first one off South Africa. The second
came from the Comoro Islands off north-west Madagascar in 1952,
and a third in Indonesian Sulawesi in 1998. The evolutionist paleontologist
J. L. B. Smith was unable to conceal his amazement at the capture
of the first Cœlacanth, saying, "If I'd met
a dinosaur in the street I wouldn't have been more astonished."20
 |
 |
Another
living Cœlacanth specimen. |
Later, photographs of a pair of Cœlacanths cavorting
was even published in National Geographic magazine! The
capture of living Cœlacanths revealed that the claims
regarding it were nothing more than deceptions. The structure that
evolutionist researchers suggested was a primitive lung turned
out to be nothing but a fat-filled swimbladder. In addition, evolutionists
had always depicted the fish as living in shallow waters, as a
potential reptile preparing to crawl onto the land where it would
continue to "evolve." Yet the Cœlacanth was
now found to be living in the deepest ocean waters—a bottom-dwelling
fish almost never rising above 180 meters below the surface.21

The tail of the living Cœlacanth and that of a 140-million-year-old
fossil specimen are identical to one another. |
In 1987, the German naturalist Hans Fricke confirmed
these research findings when he observed and photographed Cœlacanths off
the Grand Comoro Island. He observed that the fish swam backwards,
forwards and even tilted head down, but never once "walked,
crawled, or otherwise moved on the bottom with their lobed fins."22
Cœlacanth being a living fossil
eliminated the so-called evidence that evolutionists had exhibited
so proudly to support their imaginary scenario of the fish's
transition from water to land. When this creature was encountered
in 1938, it immediately revealed the fraudulent nature of the
transition from water to land. Evolutionists cast no aspersions
on the fact of this living fossil and did not seek to convince
anyone that this discovery was in error. They came up with no
new conjectures regarding the Cœlacanth and
the story of how it emerged from the sea onto dry land. The stasis
in the fossil record had demolished the story of this fish's evolution
by tearing down one of its basic premises.
Professor of
political science Robert G. Wesson set this fact out in these terms:
The bony-finned Cœlacanth,
thought to be long extinct but rediscovered in 1938, has been
approximately static some 450 million years (Avers 1989, 317).
... The nearly timeless species are not exempt from the changes
of proteins that go on in all living beings, and they could surely
vary in many ways without loss of adaptiveness, but their patterns
have become somehow frozen. ... From the point of view of conventional
evolutionary theory long-term stasis is hard to explain. Rapid
evolution ... is incongruous that species remain unchanged through
changing conditions over many million years.23
The Horseshoe Crab
The first fossil records of the horseshoe crab go back 425 million
years, yet this living fossil still lives along present-day shores.
Its tail, which allows it to walk with ease across the sand and
which is used for steering, its two eyes with their exceedingly
complex structures, and all its other unique features have remained
unchanged over the last 425 million years.
 |
Horseshoe
crab. A 450-million-year-old horseshoe crab is no different
to specimens alive today. It has possessed the same complex
features and equipment for the last half billion years
or so. Clearly, at a time when—according to Darwinists—living
things should have been evolving, no evolution actually
took place. |
The Cockroach

A 300-million-year-old cockroach, with exactly the same features
as cockroaches today. This fossil, which lived 300 million
years ago, definitively refutes Darwin's theory of evolution. |
The cockroach, the oldest winged
insect in the world, first appears in fossils some 350 million
years old, from the Carboniferous period.24 This
insect—with its various feelers and hairs that are extremely
sensitive to the slightest movement, even to air currents, its
perfect wings, and its resistant structure capable of withstanding
even radiation—is identical now to how it was 350 million
years ago.25
The Okapi
Another living fossil that invalidates one
of the greatest faulty proofs of the theory of evolution—and which even revealed
a fraud perpetrated in the name of evolution—is the okapi,
shown in the illustration below.
The fossils belonging to this animal dated
back to the Miocene epoch. The okapi had always been believed
to be extinct—that
is, right up until the first living specimen was captured in 1901.
At that time, it was taken up as an example by evolutionists and
presented as an intermediate form in the equine evolution scenario,
which itself is totally false. However, with the capture of a living
okapi, that scenario of equine evolution was also done away with.
The "evolution of the horse" was
for a long while the evolutionists' Exhibit A in regard to the
imaginary origin of mammals. Various living and extinct species
were set out, one after the other according to size, totally
ignoring the gross anatomical differences between them, and were
presented as different stages in the evolution of the horse.
This series, exhibited in natural history museums for many years,
was described in textbooks as if it were a solid proof of evolution.
Today, however, a great many evolutionists admit the invalidity
of the equine evolution scenario and confess that it is an example
of wishful thinking totally based on sleight-of-hand.
In
November, 1980, the evolutionist Boyce Rensberger addressed a four-day
symposium attended by 150 evolutionists at the Field Museum of
Natural History in Chicago, which considered problems facing the
theory of evolution. He described how the equine evolution scenario
had no basis in the fossil record and how the horse never underwent
a process of gradual evolution:
The popularly told example of horse evolution,
suggesting a gradual sequence of changes from four-toed fox-sized
creatures living nearly 50 million years ago to today's much
larger one-toed horse, has long been known to be wrong. Instead
of gradual change, fossils of each intermediate species appear
fully distinct, persist unchanged, and then become extinct. Transitional
forms are unknown.26
Rensberger was quite right; no evidence exists
that any such process as equine evolution ever took place. The
equine "series" is
totally speculative and is not based on the facts. Moreover, there
are considerable anatomical and physical differences among these
animals. What Rensberger ignores, however, is that not all the
species in the series are extinct. The okapi, encountered in 1901,
showed that a creature that evolutionists depicted as an intermediate
form was in fact still alive today. This animal, which has no relation
to the horse and which bears a far closer resemblance to the zebra,
was living in the Miocene epoch (23-5.3 million years ago), displaying
the same complex features it possesses today.
The living fossil of the okapi again demolished one of the main
claims of the theory of evolution. The equine series scenario,
full of inconsistencies in all possible regards to begin with,
was finally eradicated, and another evolutionary disgrace was quietly
placed on the shelf.
Dr. Niles Eldredge of the American Museum of Natural History
said the following about this equine family-tree, which was still
lingering in the museum basement:
There have been an awful lot of stories, some
more imaginative than others, about what the nature of that history
[of life] really is. The most famous example, still on exhibit
downstairs, is the exhibit on horse evolution prepared perhaps
fifty years ago. That has been presented as the literal truth
in textbook after textbook. Now I think that is lamentable, particularly
when the people who propose those kinds of stories may themselves
be aware of the speculative nature of some of that stuff.27
Other Living Fossils

A 146 to 65-million-year-old nautilus (top), and identical
modern specimens. |
Newspapers frequently attract attention with
such headlines as "20-Milion-Year-Old
Spider Fossil Discovered" or "35-Million-Year-Old Lizard
Fossil Unearthed." Each of these reports is actually further
proof that nothing like the evolutionary process ever happened.
There are many examples of living fossils and in addition, these
examples go back hundreds of millions of years.
The crocodile
is a reptile that was living 200 million years ago, as is confirmed
by the fossil record.28 Yet it is of course
alive today. Ginkgo trees were living 125 million years ago, but
living specimens were found in China in our own time. Neopilina
molluscs were living 500 million years ago, the tuatara lizard
200 million years ago, and archaeobacteria as long ago as 3.5 billion
years ago.29 These are still alive today,
with all their complex systems and perfect structures. The nautilus,
another mollusc, was living in the seas 300 million years ago,30 and
these creatures are living, feeding and reproducing in exactly
the same form in today's seas.
The Australian and African lungfish is another
example of a living fossil that was alive 400 million years ago
and still thrives in the present. Charles Darwin was astonished
by the survival of these fish down to the present day, and in his Origin
of Species, he therefore referred to them as "anomalous
forms" that "may almost be called living fossils."31

A fossil ginkgo tree leaf dating back 125 million years, and
a present-day example. |
This is by no means the end
of the list of creatures that still survive today unchanged, in
exactly the same form as they displayed millions of years ago.
The sturgeon, mackerel, freshwater bass, herring, needlefish, lobster,
crawfish and the Devonian-period shark are all examples of living
fossils. Other examples include the jellyfish, sponges, frogs,
bees, ants, butterflies and termites. The 230-million-year-old
dragonfly, soldier ants dating back 100 million years, and the
150-million-year-old salamander are all still living today. The
same applies to arachnids such as the spider and myriapods such
as the millipede.32, 33
Finally, a spider fossilized
in amber, and estimated as being 20 million years old, was one
of the most important discoveries of the 2000s. A statement from
Manchester University announced that this spider, 4 centimeters
long and 2 centimeters wide, was identical to present-day specimens.
It is hoped that a blood specimen from the spider can extract the
arachnid's DNA.34 However, this fossil spider
is certainly not the only specimen found. Other fossil spiders
unearthed in excavations have been estimated to be hundreds of
millions of years old, and are now on exhibit in museums in various
countries of the world. The oldest known and most perfect sea spider
fossil dates back 425 million years—important evidence that
these creatures have remained unchanged for millions of years.35
The Earth contains countless other fossil specimens from millions
of years ago of organisms still living today, such as this spider,
and of other creatures now extinct. The fossils illustrated in
this book are just a few of the millions of specimens kept in various
museums.
An Australian lungfish from the Devonian
period (408-360 million years ago). Evolutionists claim that
lungfish are the ancestors of amphibians. Yet the pulmonary
structure in these fish bears no resemblance to that in terrestrial
animals.
|
 |
18. Keith S. Thomson, Living
Fossil: The Story of the Coelacanth, 1991, book cover 
19. "Evolution:Living Fossils," http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/living.htm
20. Jean-Jacques Hublin, The Hamlyn Encyclopædia of Prehistoric Animals,
New York: The Hamlyn Publishing Group Ltd., 1984, p. 120
21. Don Knapp, "New sighting of 'living fossil' intrigues scientists," CNN.com,
23 September 1998, http://edition.cnn.com/TECH/science/9809/23/living.fossil/index.html
22. "Evolution:Living Fossils," http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/living.htm
23. Wesson, Beyond Natural Selection, 1991, MIT Press: Cambridge MA,
1994, reprint, pp. 207-208
24. "Living Fossils", Discovery Education, http://school.discovery.com/lessonplans/programs/livingfossils/
25. "American cockroach," http://www.insectia.com/beta/e/iv_c202015.html
26. Boyce Rensberger, Houston Chronicle, 5 October1980, Section
4, p. 15
27. Niles Eldredge, quoted in Darwin's Enigma by Luther D. Sunderland,
Santee, CA, Master Books, 1988, p. 78.
28. "Living Fossils", Discovery Education, http://school.discovery.com/lessonplans/programs/livingfossils/
29. David Catchpoole, "'Living Fossils' Enigma," http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v22/i2/living_fossil.asp
30. Lynn Dicks, "The Creatures Time Forgot," New Scientist,
23 October 1999
31. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, Penguin Books, England, 1985,
p. 151
32. "Evolution:Living Fossils," http://www.straight-talk.net/evolution/living.htm
33. "Living Fossils," http://www.nwcreation.net/fossilsliving.html
34. "Spider 'is 20 million years old'", BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/4296398.stm
35. "A Silurian Sea Spider," Nature 431, 978-980, 21 October
2004 |